Fewer Than 2,000 Condos Sold in L.A. This Year — The Worst Start Since Bush's Second Term
Khushboo Siddhiwala
Jun 21, 2026 · 4 min read

Story
Somewhere in a Century City high-rise this morning, a two-bedroom unit with floor-to-ceiling glass and a view of the Santa Monica Mountains sits empty for the 97th consecutive day. It listed at $1.2 million in March. The price dropped twice. The HOA runs $847 monthly. Nobody has made an offer.
This unit isn't an anomaly — it's a symptom. Condo sales across Los Angeles County have collapsed to levels not seen since 2005, with fewer than 2,000 units moving in January and February combined. To put that in perspective: during the same period in 2022, when mortgage rates were already climbing, buyers closed on nearly double that number. Something fundamental has broken in the condo math, and it's not what most people assume.
The median condo price in L.A. has actually softened, making these units theoretically more accessible than the single-family homes that dominate California's suburban dreams. But accessibility is an illusion when the monthly carrying costs tell a different story. HOA fees across the county have surged an average of 23% since 2021, driven by insurance premiums that doubled after consecutive wildfire seasons and deferred maintenance bills that buildings can no longer ignore. That $847 monthly fee in Century City? It was $590 four years ago. The condo might cost less than a house in Silver Lake, but the total monthly payment increasingly doesn't.
Meanwhile, the investor class that once gobbled up L.A. condos as short-term rental cash cows has retreated. Santa Monica's strict enforcement of vacation rental bans, combined with similar restrictions rippling through West Hollywood and downtown, removed the arbitrage that made buying a $900,000 one-bedroom make financial sense. Institutional buyers who viewed condos as low-maintenance portfolio additions now see them as liability traps — one special assessment away from destroying their returns.
The geographic disparity makes the picture even stranger. While L.A. County condos languish, Orange County's median sales price for all housing hit $1.025 million last June, down 2.8% from the previous month but still reflecting robust transaction volume. San Bernardino and Riverside counties continue to attract buyers priced out of coastal markets, with median prices of $594,500 and similar figures respectively — numbers that would have seemed fantastical a decade ago but now represent the floor for California homeownership.
In the Bay Area, the dynamics differ but rhyme. San Jose sellers who listed in the first half of February captured a 3.1% premium — roughly $53,800 on the median home — according to Zillow's timing analysis. That's the highest dollar boost of any major metro in the country, suggesting that despite all the doom scrolling about tech layoffs and remote work exodus, Silicon Valley's housing market remains intensely seasonal and surprisingly competitive for those who time it right. Yet even there, nearly one in five listings now show price reductions, a figure that would have been unthinkable during the pandemic buying frenzy.
What's happening isn't a crash. It's a sorting.
The luxury condo market in L.A. tells a parallel story that seems to contradict the entry-level collapse. In the first half of 2022, 257 condos sold for $2 million or more in L.A. County — a 51% increase from the same period the prior year and more than triple the 2020 figure. Condos closing above $5 million in Greater Los Angeles jumped 175% year-over-year in that second quarter. The wealthy aren't abandoning vertical living; they're simply operating in a market that bears no relationship to the one facing a young couple trying to buy their first 900-square-foot unit in Koreatown.
This bifurcation reveals something essential about California's housing future. The middle is vanishing. You can buy a $3.2 million penthouse with concierge service and never think about the HOA fee as a percentage of your income. Or you can stretch for a $620,000 condo in Palms and watch that $650 monthly fee consume what should have been your emergency fund, your vacation budget, your margin for error.
The 2,000-unit figure isn't just a statistic — it's a referendum. Buyers aren't rejecting condos because they don't want urban convenience or maintenance-free living. They're rejecting a value proposition that no longer computes. When the HOA fee alone exceeds what your parents paid for their entire monthly mortgage in 1995, the spreadsheet stops making sense no matter how you squint at it.
California didn't build enough housing for thirty years, and now it's discovering that the housing it did build comes with carrying costs that make ownership feel like renting with extra steps and more liability.